-
Website
http://prettymuchamazing.com/ -
Original page
http://prettymuchamazing.com/feature/the-thinking-mans-take-on-the-hype-machine -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
AzaleaVerde
4 comments · 2 points
-
nicetoknovvyou
7 comments · 2 points
-
Keso
31 comments · 7 points
-
loudersoft
4 comments · 1 points
-
Robin Buckley
4 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
That said -- I absolutely love these little side-articles!
Indie rock would not be the same. It would be location based. With Hypem (and other services like it), bands like Justice can have GLOBAL audiences/fans.
Great article!!
It's really not that global either. Justice are an exception, normally its boring balding 30 plus bands on Merge. The stuff that gets picked up on now is really v
cliched blog fare. Little Boots for instance, who's kind of rubbish.
So you're debating a party that's over.
That is a plus in my book.
Love your blog, I found it yesterday via hypem :)
moral of hypem seems to be keep releasing more & more mp3s into blogs, which thereby kills the music industry. it's a pretty messed up circle.
that being said, i LOVE those sites :)
Anyways, The Hype Machine is how I found this wonderful blog.
I agree:
it kills singles
it speeds up the music, its scary that things get buried so fast
Randi Baron, B, Lisa
Don't agree:
kills albums - I buy albums anyway. real CDs. I only download albums if it has lots of hype and I really cannot get into it. This means I wouldnt have purchased it in the first place. By the time next album comes I am way more likely to buy it.
In general itunes has killed concept albums and me listening to them the whole way through.
It kills music - this just links back to the speed of music
anyway fantastic!
unfortunately us cd buyin types are in the minority. although hypem is just a tool and can be used for good (research) or evil (disposable trend-tracking) it definitely lends itself to the latter with its '3 day' hotlist.
Actually not sure if that's evil or not, but it sure is misleading.
Oh, is that a fact?
Likewise, to assume that the majority or "the base" of music fans use the Hype machine and therefore are influenced by it is equally ridiculous. Even to assume that the bulk of music fans fill their ipods with singles merits a solid source of reference, where is it? Let's be careful to not assume that we the super geeks, are the norm, eh?
Yes, the Hypem has changed the way we use music. Yes it's altered our focus on singles v. albums but I tend to think that's more a product of a generational shift, as you say, rather than something caused by Hypem. And as for music writing... there's plenty of us who write about music and don't give a damn about Hypem, don't write with it in mind, aren't listed on it, and have a small and faithful readership of friends who dig what we do nonetheless.
Thanks for a thought-provoking article!
1) "they get $$$ to put certain blogs up top." is certainly not true. Every single blog in our system is on a level playing field.
2) We have the Popular page showing only the last 3 days of tracks is our effort to highlight interesting and new tracks. If it was an ongoing thing you'd most likely find the usual suspects on top (Coldplay, Radiohead, etc etc). Not to say you don't find these on the current Popular page, but it gives other songs a fighting chance (Teki Latex is #1 right now).
For a depressing example of how the "all time" popular tracks look check out Last.FM's top tracks of 2008: http://www.last.fm/bestof/2008/track/10
(6 of them are Coldplay, 4 of them are MGMT).
Our system isn't perfect, and we certainly didn't pick 3 days to overwhelm people or kill the album etc etc. I just wanted to share our thinking and let you know we are constantly trying to improve on making music discovery fun.
* Please Please Me (Parlophone, 1963)
* With The Beatles (Parlophone, 1963)
* A Hard Day's Night (Parlophone, 1964)
* Beatles for Sale (Parlophone, 1964)
* Help! (Parlophone, 1965)
* Rubber Soul (Parlophone, 1965)
* Revolver (Parlophone, 1966)
* Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Parlophone, 1967)
* Magical Mystery Tour (U.S. only. Released as a Double EP in the UK) (Capitol, 1967)
* The Beatles ("The White Album") (Apple, 1968)
* Yellow Submarine (Apple, 1969)
* Abbey Road (Apple, 1969)
* Let It Be (Apple, 1970)
13 albums in 7 years.
Most people aren't audio buffs with hi-fi ears who can tell the difference between a 16bit 44.1Khz PCM .WAV file and a 192k MP3.
So, it's easy to understand why some are not compelled to spend on money they can get for free (even if it is a low quality mp3 rip).
Also, a lot of tracks, these days, seem to get leaked to the public/internet early via someone copying the promo cd/mp3 or leaking the demo, in some cases!
I understand, It's difficult to compete with "free".
But, I would also urge DFA to up their game, and release less medicore indie dance drivel.
Concentrate on putting out anthems, instead.
Put out great songs that are worthy of our hard earned cash.
Sure, some will download a free copy of copy.
But, many others, will buy, buy, buy.
They have yet to release anything remotely great as Dinsoaur L, Arthur Russell, Loose Joints, George Kranz, Laidbach, The Normal, The B-52s, Tom Tom Club, Talking Heads, Joy Division, New Order, Depeche Mode, The Human League, Soft Cell, Fad Gadget, The The, Kraftwerk...
Need I go on?
Jonathan Galkin - If your back catalogue was your school homework, it would be marked 'easily distracted, could do better, & see me after class'.
The speed at which music is available is killing the soul and depth that music once had and you could not have summarized it better!
Thank you.